CrawlForge
HomePricingDocumentationBlog
Web Scraping

CrawlForge vs Apify vs ScrapingBee: 2025 Web Scraping Comparison

C
CrawlForge Team
Engineering Team
December 25, 2025
11 min read

Choosing the right web scraping platform can make or break your project. In 2025, three platforms stand out for AI developers: CrawlForge MCP, Apify, and ScrapingBee.

This comparison analyzes features, pricing, and use cases to help you make the right choice.

Quick Comparison

FeatureCrawlForge MCPApifyScrapingBee
Primary FocusAI/MCP IntegrationGeneral AutomationProxy-Based Scraping
Tools/Actors18 built-in2,000+ marketplaceProxy API only
MCP SupportNativeNoNo
Claude IntegrationYes (native)ManualManual
Pricing ModelCreditsCompute UnitsAPI Calls
Free Tier1,000 credits5 actors1,000 calls
Starting Price$19/mo$49/mo$49/mo

Feature Deep Dive

CrawlForge MCP

Strengths:

  • ✅ Native MCP server for Claude Desktop
  • ✅ 18 specialized tools (research, extraction, analysis)
  • ✅ AI-powered features (sentiment, summarization, deep research)
  • ✅ Credit-based pricing (pay for what you use)
  • ✅ Simple setup (5 minutes to first request)

Best For:

  • AI engineers building with Claude
  • LangChain/LlamaIndex applications
  • Research and content aggregation
  • Teams wanting simplicity over complexity

Limitations:

  • No visual workflow builder
  • Fewer pre-built scrapers than Apify marketplace
  • No built-in scheduling (use n8n or cron)

Apify

Strengths:

  • ✅ Largest marketplace (2,000+ actors)
  • ✅ Visual workflow builder
  • ✅ Built-in scheduling and monitoring
  • ✅ Strong community and documentation
  • ✅ Enterprise features (SSO, audit logs)

Best For:

  • Complex automation workflows
  • Teams needing pre-built scrapers
  • Enterprise deployments with compliance needs
  • Non-developers using visual tools

Limitations:

  • No native MCP/Claude integration
  • Compute unit pricing can be unpredictable
  • Learning curve for custom actors
  • Overkill for simple use cases

ScrapingBee

Strengths:

  • ✅ Simple proxy-based API
  • ✅ Excellent JavaScript rendering
  • ✅ Good residential proxy network
  • ✅ Straightforward pricing
  • ✅ No infrastructure to manage

Best For:

  • Simple proxy-based scraping
  • JavaScript-heavy websites
  • Avoiding IP blocks
  • Developers wanting minimal setup

Limitations:

  • No AI features
  • No MCP support
  • Limited to proxy + rendering
  • No content extraction or analysis

Pricing Comparison

Entry-Level (Hobbyist/Indie)

PlatformPlanPriceWhat You Get
CrawlForgeHobby$19/mo5,000 credits (~1,000+ requests)
ApifyPersonal$49/mo100 compute units
ScrapingBeeFreelance$49/mo150,000 API credits

Winner: CrawlForge - Best price-to-value for AI use cases

Mid-Tier (Startup/Team)

PlatformPlanPriceWhat You Get
CrawlForgeProfessional$99/mo50,000 credits
ApifyTeam$299/mo500 compute units + team features
ScrapingBeeStartup$99/mo300,000 API credits

Winner: Depends - CrawlForge for AI features, ScrapingBee for pure volume

Enterprise

PlatformPlanPriceWhat You Get
CrawlForgeBusiness$399/mo250,000 credits + priority support
ApifyEnterpriseCustomUnlimited + dedicated support
ScrapingBeeBusiness$249/mo1M API credits

Winner: Apify for enterprise features, CrawlForge for AI-focused teams

Use Case Analysis

Use Case 1: Building a RAG System

Scenario: You need to fetch, parse, and index web content for an AI chatbot.

PlatformApproachCredits/Cost
CrawlForgeextract_content + analyze_content5 credits/page
ApifyWeb Scraper actor + custom processing~0.5 compute units/100 pages
ScrapingBeeAPI call + custom parsing1 credit/page

Recommendation: CrawlForge - Native AI tools reduce pipeline complexity

Use Case 2: Competitor Price Monitoring

Scenario: Monitor 50 product pages daily for price changes.

PlatformApproachMonthly Cost
CrawlForgetrack_changes + batch_scrape~$19 (Hobby)
ApifyPrice Monitor actor~$49 (Personal)
ScrapingBeeAPI + custom logic~$49 (Freelance)

Recommendation: CrawlForge - track_changes is purpose-built for this

Use Case 3: Large-Scale Data Collection

Scenario: Scrape 100,000+ pages monthly for a data pipeline.

PlatformApproachMonthly Cost
CrawlForgebatch_scrape~$399 (Business)
ApifyCustom actor with crawl scheduling~$299+
ScrapingBeeAPI calls~$249

Recommendation: Apify or ScrapingBee - Built for volume

Use Case 4: AI Research Assistant

Scenario: Build a Claude-powered research tool that searches and synthesizes information.

PlatformApproachIntegration Effort
CrawlForgeNative MCP, deep_research tool5 minutes
ApifyCustom integration via REST API2-4 hours
ScrapingBeeCustom integration via REST API2-4 hours

Recommendation: CrawlForge - Native MCP support is a game-changer

Technical Comparison

API Complexity

CrawlForge:

Bash

Apify:

Bash

ScrapingBee:

Bash

Simplicity Winner: CrawlForge - Consistent tool-based API

Claude/MCP Integration

PlatformIntegrationSetup Time
CrawlForgeNative MCP server5 minutes
ApifyCustom wrapper required2+ hours
ScrapingBeeCustom wrapper required2+ hours

Winner: CrawlForge - Only native MCP option

JavaScript Rendering

PlatformApproachReliability
CrawlForgePlaywright-based, stealth_mode availableHigh
ApifyPuppeteer/Playwright actorsHigh
ScrapingBeeChrome rendering serviceHigh

Winner: Tie - All handle JS well

The Verdict

Choose CrawlForge If:

  • You're building AI applications with Claude
  • You need MCP integration
  • You want AI-powered extraction and research tools
  • You prefer simple, predictable pricing
  • You value speed of setup over customization

Choose Apify If:

  • You need complex, scheduled workflows
  • You want access to pre-built scrapers
  • You're an enterprise with compliance needs
  • You prefer visual workflow builders
  • You need team collaboration features

Choose ScrapingBee If:

  • You just need reliable proxy-based scraping
  • JavaScript rendering is your main challenge
  • You want the simplest possible API
  • Volume matters more than features
  • You'll build custom parsing yourself

Migration Guide

From ScrapingBee to CrawlForge

Typescript

From Apify to CrawlForge

Typescript

Get Started with CrawlForge

Ready to try the AI-native approach to web scraping?

  1. Sign up free at crawlforge.dev/signup
  2. Get 1,000 credits (no credit card required)
  3. Connect to Claude Desktop in 5 minutes

Questions? Reach out on GitHub or Twitter.

Tags

ComparisonApifyScrapingBeeWeb ScrapingAPI

About the Author

C
CrawlForge Team

Engineering Team

Related Articles

Product Updates
18 Web Scraping Tools in One MCP Server: The Complete CrawlForge Guide
Discover all 18 powerful web scraping tools available in CrawlForge MCP - from basic URL fetching to AI-powered research. Learn which tool to use for every scraping scenario.
MCPWeb ScrapingAPI+2 more
C
CrawlForge Team
Dec 23, 2025
10 min read
Read more
Web Scraping
MCP vs REST: Why We Built a Native MCP Scraping Server
Compare MCP (Model Context Protocol) vs REST APIs for AI applications. Learn why native MCP integration provides better developer experience and performance.
MCPAPI DesignTechnical Architecture+1 more
C
CrawlForge Team
Dec 16, 2025
10 min read
Read more
Tutorials
How to Add Web Scraping to Claude Desktop in 5 Minutes
Learn how to enable web scraping capabilities in Claude Desktop using the Model Context Protocol (MCP) and CrawlForge in just 5 minutes.
Claude DesktopMCPWeb Scraping+1 more
C
CrawlForge Team
Dec 20, 2025
8 min read
Read more

Footer

CrawlForge

Enterprise web scraping for AI Agents. 18 specialized MCP tools designed for modern developers building intelligent systems.

Product

  • Features
  • Pricing

Resources

  • Getting Started
  • Guides
  • Blog
  • FAQ

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Cookie Policy
  • Acceptable Use

Stay updated

Get the latest updates on new tools and features.

Built with Next.js and MCP protocol

© 2025 CrawlForge. All rights reserved.